神话的背后暗流涌动着很多不为人知的细节。比如，你花大价钱投票的区块链项目，是怎样说服你为它的成功上币买单的，亦或者你懂这个项目到底要解决什么问题，使命是什么，运行机制是怎样的。
Behind the myth is a lot of hidden details. For example, how the block chain project that you spent a lot of money on, how you convinced you to pay for its success, or you know what the project is about, what the mission is, what the mechanism is.
很简单的问题，你到底是信仰还是怕错过了上车的机会，回头来看，你是否赚到钱了？
The simple question is, do you believe or are you afraid you'll miss the chance to get in the car?
火币网修改投票上币规则
. Modifies the voting rule.
3月2日，证券时报·创业资本汇记者报道的《投票上币异常火爆：布道者笑了，平台赚了，渴望上车的韭菜被收割了》在币圈、链圈引起了很大反响。紧随其后，火币Pro官网修改了投票上币规则，与原有规则相比，火币网在投票周期、票数得分方面均有较大修改。
On March 2nd, the newspaper The Securities Times, Business Capital Exchange, reported that the vote was unusually hot: the sermons laughed, the platform made money, and the groceries that wanted to get in the car were harvested. The chain of coins and the chain of chains were reverberated. Immediately after that, the Firebill Pro network changed the rules for voting on the dollar, which, compared to the original rules, changed considerably in terms of the voting cycle and the number of votes.
证券时报·创业资本汇记者对修改的规则进行分析：
An analysis of the revised rules was carried out by the Securities Times — Entrepreneurship Capital Exchange Reporter:
首先，投票周期调整为72小时，减少了项目方拉票操作的时间，最终决定能否上币，不再是之前简单的投票数量，而是新增了保证金得分和超级节点两个因素。
First, the voting cycle was adjusted to 72 hours, reducing the time taken by the project party to draw votes, and ultimately deciding whether or not to raise the currency was no longer a simple number of votes previously cast, but a new factor was added, namely, a bond score and a super-node.
所谓的保证金得分，就是项目方根据自己需要，以HT的形式为项目提供保证金，保证金从上线后第二个月开始，分12个月退还，按月退还。
The so-called bond score is that the project party provides a bond for the project in the form of HT, based on its own needs, which begins the second day after it has been brought on line and is refunded in 12 months and monthly.
注意了，项目方需要购买HT来作为保证金，而且保证金并没有设置上限，也就是说项目方想购买多少HT都可以，因为到头来平台总是会归还的，那项目方增加保证金，上币率就大大提高，但是投票用户购买HT进行投票的就不会这么轻易归还，除非是要等到团队解散，团队要求退市、流动性不足等情况，才会用剩余的保证金作为用户补偿，这怎么看怎么就像平台和项目方唱的双簧，目的就是为了吸引用户投票，风险全部用户承担。
Note that the project party needs to purchase HT as a bond and that the bond is not capped, meaning that the project party can buy as much HT as it wants, because the platform will always return, and that the project party increases the bond and the upper currency ratio will increase significantly, but the voting user will not return it so easily, unless the team demands the withdrawal of the market, insufficient mobility, etc., and the remaining bond will not be used as compensation for the user, as if the platform and the project party were singing a double-single, the purpose of which is to attract the user to vote and all the risk users would bear.
再来说下这个规则里的超级投票节点，引入行业信誉良好的专业投资机构作为超级节点进行专业投票，那么何为信誉良好的专业投资机构，怎么评定？
What would be the assessment of a reputable professional investment agency if, in addition to the super-vote nodes in this rule, a professional node was introduced to vote as a super-node?
打脸的是，超级节点采用实名制投票，每次投票需同时给予项目点评，说好的区块链匿名性呢？最后投票结束后，HADAX平台会对数据进行清晰分析、人工回访等动作，确保投票的真实性后再行公布，这人工回访是怎么回事，难道还要一个一个电话询问？这可一点都不符合区块链披着高科技的炫酷外表。
Face-to-face, the supernode uses a real-name vote, and each vote requires an evaluation of the project. What about the anonymousness of the chain of blocks? After the final vote, the HADAX platform will conduct a clear analysis of the data, a manual return, etc., to ensure the authenticity of the vote and then release it.
证券时报·创业资本汇记者在上一篇文章中提到火币网投票上币存在严重刷票行为，火币Pro在此次修改规则中算是作出了回应，火币Pro在下一次投票上币中会确保投票真实性，一旦确认存在刷票行为，立即取消上币资格，但如何确认刷票，这才是值得深究的问题。
In his previous article, the Securities Times Entrepreneurship Capital Exchange journalist mentioned that there was a serious act of placarding of the currency on the tender web vote. In response to this revision of the rules, the plaque Pro would ensure the authenticity of the vote in the next ballot and would disqualify the money once it was confirmed that the plaque had been done, but the question of how to confirm the plaque was a matter for further discussion.
花大价钱投票的区块链项目靠谱吗？
Is the block chain project that
接下来我们再深入聊聊投票上币的区块链项目这档子儿事。
We're going to go on to talk about the block chain project, which has been voted on.
2月28日，火币HADAX对外发布“Huobi HADAX第一期投票结果公示”，公布了第一期投票上币最终入选的10个数字货币：EGCC、SHE、GSC、CNN、MEX、IIC、UC、AAC、UIP、UUU。
On 28 February, the tender HADAX issued a public announcement of the results of the first round of voting in Huobi HADAX and published the 10 digital currencies that were finally elected in the first round of voting: EGCC, SHE, GSC, CNN, MEX, IIC, UC, AAC, UIP, UUU.
我们以第一名ICO项目EGCC为例，据其官网介绍Engine是基于区块链建立的汽车大数据共享平台，为每辆车建立终身不可篡改的数字档案。Engine将在车况查询、车辆估值评估、汽车交易、汽车金融服务、汽车安全领域发挥重要作用。比如在二手车交易服务方面，将改善信息不对称困扰二手市场真正实现二手公平交易车。
In the case of the first ICO project, EGCC, the network of officials described Engine as a big data-sharing platform for automobiles based on block chains, creating permanent digital files for each vehicle. Engine will play an important role in the areas of car condition inquiries, vehicle valuation assessments, car transactions, automobile financial services, and car safety. For example, improving information asymmetries will plague second-hand fair-traded cars.
几乎所有的上币项目，都会在其白皮书上写着他们的项目正是充分利用了区块链去中心化的特质，能让并不互信的用户之间，基于区块链的“真实性、不可篡改性”达成共识，做到“去信用化”。换言之，只要隔着区块链，对面的坏人就无法作恶。
Almost all of the upper-currency projects are written in their white papers, making full use of the characteristics of block chains to centralize them, allowing untrustworthy users to reach a consensus based on the “real and non-frozen” nature of block chains and to “de-credit”. In other words, as long as they are separated from them, the bad people across the way cannot do evil.
那么问题来了，即便区块链能确保链上信息不被篡改，那谁来保证卖家上传的车况信息一开始就是真实的？
So the question arises, even if the block chain ensures that the information on the chain is not tampered with, who will ensure that the traffic information uploaded by the seller is true from the outset?
交易中最大的信用问题就是卖方以次充好，而买家没有足够的专业知识来判断卖方是否作假，这是所谓的信息不对称性，于是人们就需要专业的、具有一定公信力的第三方来认证车况、评估价格。如果信息不对称性无法消除，那么市面上成交的大多数二手车都将是以次充好的劣质车，真正的优质车是无法以公允价格卖出的。
The biggest credit problem in a transaction is that the seller is suboptimal and the buyer does not have sufficient expertise to judge whether the seller is a fraud, which is called information asymmetry, so that people need a professional, credible third party to authenticate the traffic and evaluate the price. If the information asymmetry cannot be eliminated, most used cars that are traded on the market will be suboptimal, and true quality cars cannot be sold at fair prices.
同理，第二名ICO项目SHE，其介绍是用技术的革新改变全球平安健康保障行业的商业模式，区块链上的数字资产（SHE）可以有效削弱通货膨胀，并全球流通，形成资产避险。其次，去中心化信任问题，能够避免传统保险机构在运营的过程中骗保等，最后还能保护用户隐私等问题
Similarly, the second ICO project, SHE, introduces technological innovations to change the business model of the safe and healthy global industry, and digital assets (SHE) on the block chain can effectively reduce inflation and create a global flow of assets to avoid risk. Second, decentralize trust issues, avoid traditional insurance institutions from defrauding in the course of their operations, and, lastly, protect the privacy of users.
说到数字资产能够形成资产避险，恐怕是投资数字资产才是最大的风险，因为将来还可能面临流动性不足，用户不接受，市场不流通，价格波动大等一系列风险。其次关于避免用户骗保，那如何保证用户从一开始就上传假的病例消息？如果从源头上就是假的，那么接下来一系列过程还会是真的吗？
When it comes to digital assets, it is probably the investment of digital assets that poses the greatest risk, because in the future they may face a series of risks, such as insufficient liquidity, non-acceptance by users, non-flowing markets, and high price volatility. Secondly, with regard to avoiding user fraud, how do you ensure that users upload false case information from the outset?
财经专栏财经肖磊认为，对于目前ICO 项目上币情况，很多都不成熟，区块链的优点在于去中心化，去信任化，但这只是理想中的情况，区块链理念无视这些基本的经济逻辑，试图通过用户直接交易（ P2P ）的方式驱除中间人，这极大地增加了交易节点，降低了交易的专业性，注定只能是个乌托邦式的空想。
The financial column has argued that many of the current ICO cases are premature and that the advantage of the block chain is de-centralization and de-trust, but this is the ideal scenario, where the block chain concept ignores these fundamental economic logics and attempts to remove the middleman through direct transactions (P2P) by the user, which greatly increases the trading nodes, reduces the professionalism of the transaction and is bound to be a utopia.
敢问，一心踢开第三方的区块链应用在这个交易场景中有任何用武之地吗？答案显示是没有。区块链要革谁的命，首先要自证其所为的去中心化、去信任化这套逻辑是否行得通。仅凭区块链技术不可能满足实体经济对信用风险管理的要求，所谓的“去信用化”只是一个纯粹的忽悠。
The answer is no. The logic of de-centralizing and de-trusting what the block chain is supposed to do is self-proclaimed. The block chain technology alone is unlikely to meet the entity’s credit risk management requirements, and the so-called “de-creditation” is simply a punctuation.
在《为什么说区块链也不是什么好东西》一文中，马化腾口述，拨开区块链看似深奥的“高科技”面纱，究其背后的逻辑，充其量只是个保证信息安全的加密共享系统，可惜的是，信息安全和共享机制从来都不是信用管理的关注点。
In the article "Why is it not a good thing to say about block chains? ", the Mardi Gras told the story of the seemingly deep “high-tech” veil, the logic behind which, at best, is a secure encryption and sharing system for information. Unfortunately, information security and sharing mechanisms have never been the focus of credit management.
在三点钟区块链群里，有不少人道出了目前上币的情况：币圈的逻辑是先圈钱，再做事，那白皮书都是编出来的，不过有一点必须得真实，就是团队背景，团队好，项目可以调整，团队不好，白皮书写得好也没用。
In the 3 o'clock block chain, there is a lot of humanism in the current situation: the logic of the currency circle is to circle the money and then do the work. The white paper is all made up, but one thing must be true: the team background, the good team, the project can be adjusted, the team is not good, the white paper is not good or useful.
你看，这环环相扣的吸粉逻辑多么令人可怕。
You see, this interlocking powder-smoking logic is horrible.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论