凤凰网WEMONEY讯 3月8日，数字货币交易所币安（Binance）针对3月7日晚VIA/BTC 交易异动，触发自动停止提币事件进行了回应说明。
On March 8th, Phoenix Network Wemoney, the Digital Currency Exchange Currency Security (Binance) responded to an altercation of the VIA/BTC transaction on the night of March 7, triggering the automatic suspension of the tender.
同时，币安一内部工作人员告诉凤凰网WEMONEY，在此次黑客攻击事件中，如果用户是因为被盗带来损失，币安将会进行处理；但如果是自行交易用户则不做处理。
At the same time, an insider told Wemoney on Phoenix that, in the case of the hacker attack, it would be handled if the user suffered a loss as a result of the theft, but not if it was a self-trading user.
此前，多位用户反映，币安交易系统在3月7日晚间出现故障，不少用户发现自己币安账户中持有的各种各样的代币、数字货币被卖出换成了比特币，主要涉及超过20个币种。
Previously, several users had reported that the currency exchange system had broken down during the night of 7 March and that a number of users had found various forms of currency held in their currency accounts and that digital currency had been sold into bitcoin, mainly involving more than 20 currencies.
3月7日深夜，币安暂停了所有币种的提现。与此同时，包括币安、火币在内的加密货币市场全盘暴跌，BTC、BCH、ETH等主流货币跌幅均超过5%。币安的BTC/USDT交易也出现大量卖单，其中BTC跌破10000美元。
At the same time, the market for encoded currencies, including currency security, currency coins, fell sharply, with mainstream currencies like BTC, BCH, and ETH falling by more than 5%. The BTC/USDT deal also showed up in large quantities, with BTC falling by $10,000.
有用户指出，币安出现故障主要是因为部分API机器人被黑客攻击，黑客利用盗用用户的账号高价买入VIA币，导致VIA币最高点价格被爆拉至0.025美元，与24H内最低点相比涨幅超过11000%。
According to some users, the failure of currency security was due mainly to the hacking of some API robots, which used the account number of the embezzled user to buy VIA, which resulted in an explosion of the highest price of VIA to $0.025, an increase of more than 11,000 per cent compared to the lowest point in 24H.
3月8日，币安发布公告对整个事件始末进行了回应。币安方面称，在香港时间3月7日22:58-22:59两分钟内，VIA/BTC交易对异动，从而触发系统风控，导致自动停止提币。币安方面认为，这是一次大规模通过钓鱼获取用户账号并试图盗币事件。目前所有资金安全，无任何资金逃离。
On 8 March, a currency announcement was issued in response to the whole incident. The currency security side stated that, within 22:58-22:59 two minutes of Hong Kong time on 7 March, the VIA/BTC transaction was different, triggering system wind control, which led to the automatic suspension of the deposit. The currency security side argued that it was a large-scale fishing effort to obtain user accounts and attempted to steal money.
根据币安公告，黑客在长时间里，利用第三方钓鱼网站偷盗用户的账号登录信息。通过使用unicode的Binance域名钓鱼。黑客获得账号后，自动创建交易API，之后便无动作。直至3月7日黑客通过盗取的API Key，在VIA/BTC交易市场，程序化下市价买单，和31个预先充值VIA币的账号高价卖VIA。目的为把BTC输入到31个预先准备的账号，然后迅速想将这31个账号里的BTC提走。
According to the currency bulletin, hackers steal accounts from their customers for a long time using a third-party fishing website. Fishing is done by using the Binance domain of unicode. After hackers get the account number, they automatically create the transaction API, and then do nothing. Until March 7, hackers took the stolen API Key, at the VIA/BTC trading market, programmed the purchase of the market price and 31 pre-filled VIA account numbers to sell VIA. The purpose is to enter BTC into 31 pre-prepared accounts and then quickly want to remove BTC from those 31 accounts.
据了解，上述整个过程在两分钟内进行，异常交易触发了自动风控，导致提币暂停，而上述VIA币并未被提出，黑客控制的31个账号预先存入的VIA币也被冻结。
It is understood that the entire process took place within two minutes, that the unusual transactions triggered automatic wind control, which led to the suspension of the coin, and that the above-mentioned VIA currency was not presented and that the pre-positioned VIA currency of 31 accounts controlled by hackers was frozen.
值得注意的是，币安方面称，此次事件是黑客有组织有预谋的，在成功钓鱼用户的账号信息后，并不急于获利，而是耐心等到最佳时机，选择了流动性较低的VIA币，来最大化自己的获利。有部分用户因自己的账号被钓鱼者偷盗，并已把BTC买成VIA或其它币，但由于这些交易对手方不是黑客账号，币安无法回滚交易。
It is worth noting that, according to the currency security side, the incident was organized by hackers who, after successfully fishing users’ account numbers, were not eager to profit, but patiently waited for the best of times and chose the less liquid VIA to maximize their profits. Some users were stolen by fishermen for their account numbers and bought BTC into VIA or other currencies, but since the rivals were not hackers, they were unable to roll back the deal.
对于“币安无法回滚交易”说法，市场上众说纷纭，有媒体解读为其言下之意是：被黑客盗走的比特币，因为已经兑换称了其他币种，造成的损失由投资者自行承担。
For & & ldquo; currency cannot roll back & & rdquao; there is talk in the market, and the media interpret it to mean that bitcoin is stolen by hackers because other currencies have been converted and the losses incurred are borne by the investors themselves.
对此，凤凰网WEMONEY联系到币安一内部工作人员，对方回应称，在此次黑客攻击事件中，币安并没有丢币，因此没有“被盗”一说。如果用户是因为被盗带来损失，币安将会进行处理；但如果是自行交易用户，币安将不做处理。也就是说，自行交易者将自担损失。
In response, the Phoenix Network WEMONEY contacted an insider, who responded that during the hacker attack, the currency had not been lost and therefore not “ stolen & & rdquao; one said that if the user had lost because of the theft, the currency would be treated; but if the user was trading on his own, the money would not be dealt with. That is, the self-trading person would be responsible for the loss.
就上述黑客事件，中国社科院金融研究所法与金融研究室副主任尹振涛表示，如果是交易所因技术原因被黑客攻击，客户受到损失，那平台需按相应法律法规进行一定的赔偿，这在国外有明显的案例。
In the case of the aforementioned hackers, YOON Zhentao, Deputy Director-General of the Financial Research and Studies Unit of the China Social and Economic Institute, stated that if the exchange was hit by hackers for technical reasons and the client suffered damage, the platform was subject to a certain amount of compensation in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, as is evident in the case of foreign countries.
“不过，如果有人能够举证，被盗并非平台造成，而是客户自身原因导致账户被盗，那平台的责任就会相应降低。但即便如此，由于在信息服务、防范等方面未尽到应有的责任，平台方面还是要承担相应责任。”尹振涛说。（凤凰网WEMONEY 刘四红/文 张颖馨/编辑）
& & ldquo; however, liability for the platform will be reduced if someone can prove that the theft was not caused by the platform, but by the client's own cause. But even so, the platform has to assume responsibility for the failure of due diligence in information services, prevention, etc.. & & & & & & & & Zhentao said. (Oxford Network WEMONEY Liu 4 Red/Wing Zhang / Edition) 
>
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论