是的,后来出现了“零定律”：机器人必须保护人类的整体利益不受伤害,其它三条定律都是在这一前提下才能成立.
Yes, then & & ldquao; Zero Law & & rdquao; : Robots must protect the general interests of human beings from harm, and all three other laws can only be established on this premise.
为什么后来要定出这条“零定律”呢?打个比方,为了维持国家或者说世界的整体秩序,我们制定法律,必须要执行一些人的死刑.这种情况下,机器人该不该阻止死刑的执行呢?显然是不允许的,因为这样就破坏了我们维持的秩序,也就是伤害了人类的整体利益.
Why then would this & ldquo; zero law & rdquao; what? For example, in order to maintain the general order of the country or the world, we make laws that require the execution of some people. Should robots, in this case, stop the execution of the death penalty?
所以新的阿西莫夫的定律为：
So the law of the new Asimov is:
第零定律：机器人不得伤害人类,或目睹人类将遭受危险而袖手不管.
Law No. 0: Robots must not harm human beings or stand by while they see that they will be in danger.
第一定律：机器人不得伤害人类个体,或者目睹人类个体将遭受危险而袖手不管,除非这违反了机器人学第零定律.
Rule number one: Robots must not harm individual human beings or witness that individual human beings will be exposed to danger and will not be allowed to do so unless it violates the laws of robotics.
第二定律：机器人必须服从人给予它的命令,当该命令与第零定律或者第一定律冲突时例外.
Second law: Robots have to obey a man's order, except when it conflicts with Law No. 0 or a certain law.
第三：机器人在不违反第零、第一、第二定律的情况下要尽可能保护自己的生存.
Third: Robots must protect their survival as far as possible, without violating the laws of zero, first and second...
三定律加上零定律,看来堪称完美,但是,“人类的整体利益”这种混沌的概念,连人类自己都搞不明白,更不要说那些用0和1来想问题的机器人了.威尔•史密斯曾说：“《我,机器人》的中心概念是机器人没有问题,科技本身也不是问题,人类逻辑的极限才是真正的问题.”的确,人类现有的逻辑对很多问题都是无能为力的,所以,个人认为所谓的“零定律”根本是起不到什么作用的.
Three laws, plus zero laws, seem perfect, but, “ overall human interests & & rdquo; this notion of confusion, even humans themselves, does not understand, not to mention the robots that think of the problem with zero and one, Will & Bull; Smith once said: &ldquao; I, Robots, the central concept is that robots are no problem, and technology is not a problem per se, and the limits of human logic are the real problem. & & rdquao; indeed, the existing logic of humans is powerless on many issues, so the individual considers the so-called & ldquao; zero law & rdquao; nothing at all.
除此,另一个科幻作家罗杰·克拉克在一篇论文中还指出了三条潜在的定律：
In addition to this, another Sci-fi writer, Roger & Middot, also noted three potential laws in a paper by Clark:
元定律：机器人可以什么也不做,除非它的行动符合机器人学定律.此定律置于第零、第一、第二、第三定律之前.
The law of metrology: Robots can do nothing unless they act in accordance with the law of robotics. The law is before the laws of zero, first, second and third.
第四定律：机器人必须履行内置程序所赋予的责任,除非这与其他高阶的定律冲突.
Law number four: Robots must perform the responsibilities assigned by the built-in program, unless it conflicts with other high-level laws.
繁殖定律：机器人不得参与机器人的设计和制造,除非新的机器人的行动服从机器人学定律.
The law of reproduction: Robots are not allowed to participate in the design and manufacture of robots unless the actions of new robots are governed by the law of robotics.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论